Originally Posted by
Spiff
I disagree with both of your statements.
The original proposal was not perfect by any stretch of the imagination. That's why I and 6 other people voted against it. Politics had nothing to do with that vote. Politics have nothing to do with any current or future proposals, as far as I am concerned.
If some future ambassador proposal makes sense for FlyerTalk and isn't filled with riders and rules that I don't agree with, then I will probably vote for it. "Politics" as you so quaintly put it, don't drive my decision, nor do I suspect they drive much of the rest of TalkBoard's decisions.
I agree with
Spiff and disagree with
B747-437Bs assessment. Indeed, given all of the posts in this Forum, I am troubled that Punki and Koko are so quick to assign credibility to B -747-437's post. So many FT'rs have weighed-in. Yet, one post, in particular, seems to shine by 2 particular members of Talk Board. I would like to think that this proposal is being evaluated objectively.