FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - VX to trim low-load flights, increase high-load ones
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 4:42 pm
  #9  
aviators99
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
50 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Miami, FL, USA
Posts: 4,104
Originally Posted by eponymous_coward
Well, without DOT data, it's hard to say what's likely to get cut, but that won't stop me from speculating irresponsibly.

Isn't the dark A319 limited to short haul intra-CA and SFO-LAS- they don't run it on *-SEA and *-JFK/IAD? And isn't it supposed to be gone into refit by the time Q4 rolls around in September, anyway? Some of the posts in the dark A319 thread seem to indicate that to be the case, and it would be the logical way to handle an expansion slowdown, especially since flying it kind of hurts the VX brand.

I would assume that some of the Q4 service they'll want to add is *-ORD, which wouldn't get a dark plane since those would be 3-4 hour flights, and the anecdotal reports I've heard is that midweek intra-CA/SFO-LAS is sort of light, which concurs with my limited observations (this summer, pricing out some of my future trips, I've found fairly cheap VX fares SEA-SFO-LAS midweek, but the prices are astronomical on weekends, and the LAS-SFO legs are packed on Sundays- in some cases, F is CHEAPER than Y).
It's been to SEA twice (as of last month). From what I understand, they haven't used it on true longhauls.

My take on the announcement is that capacity will remain the same in terms of the system, but capacity will get shifted around. I did not read anything about "expansion slowdown", although that seems to have been going on for a while now, as they haven't introduced any new stations.
aviators99 is offline