FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Now I understand why some FTers here say ex-MUC FAs are the best
Thread: Now I understand why some FTers here say ex-MUC FAs are the best
View Single Post
Old Jun 16, 2008 | 12:28 pm
  #29  
hch
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: INN
Posts: 3,054
Originally Posted by flysurfer
Huh? A ex-MUC flight may be part of a FRA-CDG-MUC-TXL-FRA circulation, just to make up an example. Obviously with a FRA crew. Not to mention multy-day tours, where planes with a FRA crew are parked overnight, then could continue to MUC on the next morning. Btw, I think LH has continental stations in more cities than just FRA and MUC.
As I said I don't know the crew rotation as my LH contact are more in the technical area. But LH Passage will never do a scheduled FRA-CDG-MUC-TXL-FRA rotation (once in a while it may happen during IROPS).

All LH planes are either station in FRA, MUC or decentral. The FRA planes cover all rotations ex-FRA, the MUC flights all rotations ex-MUC except to FRA, and decentral all others. Decentral has aircrafts actually stationed at DUS, HAM, STR, TXL and CGN. All decentral aircraft are 737s.

Now it could be possible that crew operations works differently, and as I said I don't have any insight into those.
hch is offline  
Reply