Originally Posted by
viking407rob
Call it what you want, you are still a puppet and cannon fodder for a system designed to screw the common folk. You can't make anyone talk. If you ever approached me with that attitude I'd quickly tell you to go eat a doughnut.
Seriously, it's a good thing we have those upstanding moral crusaders known as lawyers to protect the common folk from the evil cops in cheap JC Penny suits... And they somehow manage to do it while running the very system designed to screw the common folk!.. I guess being a moral crusader is a demaning job, so no cheap JC Penny suits for them, eh?
Interesting, and somewhat contradictory tones in that post...
Unless the judges want to be a lap dog for law enforcement, they sure should care about the outcome otherwise they are authorizing a fishing expedition, something that the Founding Fathers of the United States were very much opposed to allowing.
I think the judges should care about the merit of the warrant request, and I believe that's what Deeg was referring to. Caring about the outcome would suggest their interest in approving or disaproving the warrant request was based on something other than the warrant's merit -- and that would be unfortunate.