FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post

Apr 15, 2008 | 8:58 pm

#11

KENNECTED

Suspended

Join Date: Oct 2003

Location: New York, NY

Programs: Delta - Gold; Starwood - Platinum; HHonors - Diamond & Avis Preferred

Posts: 10,869

This has been discussed here: CO - $50 Million Expansion at CLE [threads merged]

I think the title of this thread is very misleading and will start a lot of CLE bashing.

Why would this be a reflection on CLE instead of overall poor sales from from this destination to CLE.

Why should CO start service only to have to drop it later. Continental cannot be the first and I'm sure wont be the last to plan for something like this then change based on actual sales.

In this day and age, no airline can go ahead with service if it's bad. I'm sure if bad sales were to either EWR or IAH I'm sure CO would cancel service to/from this destination as well.