My point is a summary should have been a factual account of what's been said (or at least accurately representing/reciting what's been said). Without personal interpretation or perceptions, without adding any colorful or emotional phrases/words. Sadly to say, that's not what I saw from your 3-point summary. That could be interpreted (by me) that you didn't actually capture the points from the again-OMNI-post-counting side. I'd referenced other posts to let you know I am not the only one who's feeling that way (hence I assume it shouldn't be a language barrier issue).

I do apprecaite your taking time to post your summarized "perception" though.

Misunderstanding is not a healthy way to form one's opinion. I expect all TB members to excise their best judgement and vote. Any of the votes should be based on true understanding (of each perspective, or as many as possible).