Originally Posted by
magiciansampras
To me the most valuable knowledge I've received from this board has been from OMNI. Sure, I learned how to use the ITA Software Tool and some other neat travel things in the M&P forums, but in OMNI I learned about mortgage tax incentives, how to best understand a rental market, where conservatives and liberals come from when they speak of free trade not being fair trade, etc. etc. I have also made lots of friends in OMNI as opposed to the other forums which remain fairly sterile (which is why they have off-topic threads, like the Delta Lounge).
To me OMNI is an integral part not only of FT but one of the more informative and knowledge-rich forums anywhere. As such I think the knowledge there is deserving to "count" in any meaningful sense of the word. The way we have things "count" around here is to have them increase post count totals.
In short, I'll for OMNI counting. ^
This is not to say that OMNI is perfect. It's not. There are annoyances, there are game threads, there are post-padders, etc. etc. etc. However, all of these issues can be dealt with other much measures, some of which are already in place, they just need to be enforced (post padding in TOS, for instance).
You didn't answer
tonerman's question
Originally Posted by tonerman View Post
I have a simple question.
Why do you (pro post counters) feel so strongly about this?
I kinda understand the anti post counters sentiments, but honestly don't know why this is such a big deal.
You/we can get "valuable information" anywhere on FT and still not need any post counts! Not getting an increase in post count in OMNI/ or anywhere on FT does not make the information any more or less "valuable,"
Now please tell me how counting games, who will be games etc. enhance your argument to keep counts?