Hmm, so basically anyone who posts their thoughts is unsubtantiated Punki? What exactly constitutes unsubstantiated? That they agree w/ you?

You asked me specifically & I was going to respond (& did a lot of research on my own & others viewpoints), but after reading some of your comments where you disregarded others' input as either not important enough or not in keeping w/ your viewpoints (while under the guise of requesting info), I decided not to bother.

My vote is against. I made it plain to the TB members. They will take in the input, while hopefully avoiding the 1000th post by the same folk & just count their initial votes (whose initial posts are totally valid btw!).

FWIW & IMO - doing a public motion asking Randy to 'reconsider' immediately after his decision was not one of the best thought-out motions I've seen on FT. Duh. There are some thoughts on this thread (actually by folks I wouldn't normally agree w/) that to me have better value, even if who knows on their chances of success. But speaking only for myself, a public call-out right after a decision. Did I say yet?

To paraphrase Spiff, OVMV. Cheers. See you on Friday after 5:10am. "Are we there yet?"

PS - Speaking in advance, if this motion fails, I have totally sympathy for those TB members who voted against cuz the name calling & black helicopter comments will begin immediately after. Good luck!

Cheers.