Originally Posted by
majorwibi
What I'm really not liking about your posts is essentially you have just attempted to treat me like a little kid with the whole "I'm more mature at FT than you are so just shut up and deal with it" post. Jenbel did a much better job explaining to me how I might not have enough historical view on FT pre-2005 to fully understand the evolution of OMNI.
It's a corollary of "Do you know who I am (was)?"
Don't worry. Some of the old members feel they have more standing than we newer members. They use joining date as a relevant metric while claiming that metrics such as post count are irrelevant and only content matters. It's quite transparent, trust me.
The first hint is when they quote other TB votes they took place in 2-5 years ago.
While this whole thing is likely a done deal, the way it was done and then the reasoning invented after the fact was just shabby and assume that we users weren't very bright (or could use search). I find that more disturbing. It'll all blow over, but some of us won't forget about it.