FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Retaliatory Secondaries - Let's Name Them

Feb 25, 2008 | 7:55 pm

#172

birdstrike

FlyerTalk Evangelist

Join Date: Oct 2000

Posts: 15,788

No need to LOL at me, my friend. You chose to first invoke access to the AC as a rhetorical point.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spiff

To heck with that. No one should EVER have to show a BP or an ID to go airside. Further harassment based on how that BP is presented is beyond disgusting. Such harassment qualifies the checker as a pissant and they should be rung up publicly for their idiocy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by muddy

So, in your opinion, should entrance to the AC also be granted without BP or ID?

---------------

Quote:

Originally Posted by muddy

LOL ... you're seeing what you want to see but really isn't even there maybe? how do you get from:

"In any event, the line has to be drawn somewhere ... I don't think many people would want non-passengers to be able to follow family/friends into the cabin for example."

to

"if you let nonpax in ... the line should be drawn at letting them on the plane."

English is a remarkable language, but the speaker has equal responsibility to use it wisely. @:-)

Reply