Originally Posted by
NickB
I am afraid that this is pure rhetoric. I could completely reverse it to the opposite effect: "Would the absence of count hurt you or infringe on your rights? Because you like it, it should be imposed on others who find it distateful."
See, I don't think that either your version or mine says anything meaningful. Just a succession of words or formulae without substance. Empty discourse.
Havent the arguments both sides have used been essentially empty discourse?
And isnt removing post counting from OMNI really affecting those who have come to expect OMNI to count as much as the rest of FT? The change was from the commonly understood status quo which means the affect of the change is negatively affecting some who dont understand why this change occured after so much time (or why it is so focused on OMNI when other parts of FT could obviously use the same treatment)?