FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Mergers: ST Losses Dots On The Map
View Single Post
Old Feb 19, 2008, 4:30 pm
  #12  
sbm12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by Anglo Large Clawed Otter
The real question is the Caribbean.
I picked 6 random Carribean destinations (AUA, SDQ, SJU, MBJ, UVF and GCM) and from the 4 airports in question (IAD, ATL, IAH and EWR).

ATL is the best overall location (no surprise there) but not the best for each destination and in each case one of the other three is no more than 200 miles further. Sure that CASM adds up ($3K per flight, on average) but not so much that CO/UA can't be competitive, and if the feeder networks are running the way they should then it won't be a problem at all.

Code:
From  To  Distance  
EWR (40°41'33"N 74°10'07"W) GCM (19°17'34"N 81°21'28"W) 1534 mi 
IAD (38°56'40"N 77°27'21"W) GCM (19°17'34"N 81°21'28"W) 1374 mi 
IAH (29°59'04"N 95°20'29"W) GCM (19°17'34"N 81°21'28"W) 1145 mi 
ATL (33°38'12"N 84°25'41"W) GCM (19°17'34"N 81°21'28"W) 1006 mi 


EWR (40°41'33"N 74°10'07"W) UVF (13°43'59"N 60°57'09"W) 2021 mi 
IAD (38°56'40"N 77°27'21"W) UVF (13°43'59"N 60°57'09"W) 2007 mi 
IAH (29°59'04"N 95°20'29"W) UVF (13°43'59"N 60°57'09"W) 2461 mi 
ATL (33°38'12"N 84°25'41"W) UVF (13°43'59"N 60°57'09"W) 2012 mi 


EWR (40°41'33"N 74°10'07"W) AUA (12°30'05"N 70°00'55"W) 1957 mi 
IAD (38°56'40"N 77°27'21"W) AUA (12°30'05"N 70°00'55"W) 1877 mi 
IAH (29°59'04"N 95°20'29"W) AUA (12°30'05"N 70°00'55"W) 2020 mi 
ATL (33°38'12"N 84°25'41"W) AUA (12°30'05"N 70°00'55"W) 1715 mi 


EWR (40°41'33"N 74°10'07"W) MBJ (18°30'13"N 77°54'48"W) 1545 mi 
IAD (38°56'40"N 77°27'21"W) MBJ (18°30'13"N 77°54'48"W) 1408 mi 
IAH (29°59'04"N 95°20'29"W) MBJ (18°30'13"N 77°54'48"W) 1351 mi 
ATL (33°38'12"N 84°25'41"W) MBJ (18°30'13"N 77°54'48"W) 1117 mi 


EWR (40°41'33"N 74°10'07"W) SDQ (18°25'47"N 69°40'08"W) 1557 mi 
IAD (38°56'40"N 77°27'21"W) SDQ (18°25'47"N 69°40'08"W)  1488 mi 
IAH (29°59'04"N 95°20'29"W) SDQ (18°25'47"N 69°40'08"W) 1799 mi 
ATL (33°38'12"N 84°25'41"W) SDQ (18°25'47"N 69°40'08"W) 1389 mi 


EWR (40°41'33"N 74°10'07"W) SJU (18°26'22"N 66°00'07"W) 1608 mi 
IAD (38°56'40"N 77°27'21"W) SJU (18°26'22"N 66°00'07"W) 1571 mi 
IAH (29°59'04"N 95°20'29"W) SJU (18°26'22"N 66°00'07"W) 2007 mi 
ATL (33°38'12"N 84°25'41"W) SJU (18°26'22"N 66°00'07"W) 1547 mi
Looking a bit further south (CCS, LIM, EZE, GIG, SCL) it breaks down like this:

From To Initial
Heading Distance
Code:
EWR (40°41'33"N 74°10'07"W) SCL (33°23'35"S 70°47'09"W) 5102 mi 
IAD (38°56'40"N 77°27'21"W) SCL (33°23'35"S 70°47'09"W) 4995 mi 
IAH (29°59'04"N 95°20'29"W) SCL (33°23'35"S 70°47'09"W) 4646 mi 
ATL (33°38'12"N 84°25'41"W) SCL (33°23'35"S 70°47'09"W) 4695 mi 

EWR (40°41'33"N 74°10'07"W) GIG (22°48'32"S 43°14'37"W) 4800 mi 
IAD (38°56'40"N 77°27'21"W) GIG (22°48'32"S 43°14'37"W) 4791 mi 
IAH (29°59'04"N 95°20'29"W) GIG (22°48'32"S 43°14'37"W) 5016 mi 
ATL (33°38'12"N 84°25'41"W) GIG (22°48'32"S 43°14'37"W) 4735 mi 

EWR (40°41'33"N 74°10'07"W) EZE (34°49'20"S 58°32'09"W) 5290 mi 
IAD (38°56'40"N 77°27'21"W) EZE (34°49'20"S 58°32'09"W) 5217 mi 
IAH (29°59'04"N 95°20'29"W) EZE (34°49'20"S 58°32'09"W) 5062 mi 
ATL (33°38'12"N 84°25'41"W) EZE (34°49'20"S 58°32'09"W)  4999 mi 

EWR (40°41'33"N 74°10'07"W) CCS (10°36'11"N 66°59'26"W) 2118 mi 
IAD (38°56'40"N 77°27'21"W) CCS (10°36'11"N 66°59'26"W) 2055 mi 
IAH (29°59'04"N 95°20'29"W) CCS (10°36'11"N 66°59'26"W) 2260 mi 
ATL (33°38'12"N 84°25'41"W) CCS (10°36'11"N 66°59'26"W) 1933 mi 

EWR (40°41'33"N 74°10'07"W) LIM (12°01'19"S 77°06'52"W) 3631 mi 
IAD (38°56'40"N 77°27'21"W) LIM (12°01'19"S 77°06'52"W) 3506 mi 
IAH (29°59'04"N 95°20'29"W) LIM (12°01'19"S 77°06'52"W) 3133 mi 
ATL (33°38'12"N 84°25'41"W) LIM (12°01'19"S 77°06'52"W) 3176 mi
The "best" city option remains mixed and IAH represents there. Only GIG is really bad, and then only by ~280 miles. That's not terrible if you're putting together a top-notch route network headed south with the appropriate feed structure. DL/NW will suffer because they can't feed JFK sufficiently to make the thinner Europe runs as successful (IMO). That means they have to split them off to ATL and DTW. CO/UA can focus those runs on IAD/EWR, where they already have the feeder traffic and where they're an hour or three closer to Europe already and then use IAH for the bulk of the southbound flow. ATL is big and has some growth capacity, but to have both the Latin/South America and Europe operations concentrated in a single hub like that will make flow and feeds very difficult. The CO/UA approach will split those up and allow for smoother operations.

I don't see too many issues with this at all, other than what to do with DEN. I don't know how much traffic there really is connecting in the rockies that demands keeping that up.

S.
sbm12 is offline