Demean the question to obfuscate and dodge it. Interesting strategy.
Actually, I demeaned the question and then answered it anyway. Your question was and still is ridiculous, but I still took the time to answer it. I don't think that's obfuscation or an attempt to dodge it.
Maybe, maybe not... but those are the viewpoints you're getting
By a few people in this thread. Others have been rather vocal elsewhere that they are happy with the change, would like to see post counts go away all together, couldn't care less, and other views too.
and you've already made it quite clear in this thread that you don't care about member input.
Untrue. Sorry, you can't always have your way. Poor Teddy.
If you won't even listen to this group of members, how do you presume to know what the other 160,000 want? If you don't know what the other 160,000 want, and you refuse to listen to the members who do give their opinion, then exactly what do you base your votes on?
Again, your research is suspect at best. And rather presumptuous too. How about the people who posted in other threads or at other times? How about the people who have contacted me by email, PM, or telephone? I guess they don't count because they didn't happen to post in this particular thread. So sorry, there are other opinions being registered, whether you get to see them in this thread or not.
So which is it? Are you willing to consider member input? Or are you just going to steadfastly support Randy's position regardless of member opinions?
I've already answered this rather ridiculous question.
Neither... I'm simply stating that other Flyertalkers
may feel differently come election time if they realize that a certain TB member doesn't care to consider the input of the
members who elected him.
And other FlyerTalkers might not be reaching the same bizarre "It's all about me!!!" conclusions that you are.