Originally Posted by
magiciansampras
Not to the questions that Punki asked, he doesn't.
By implication, he
has already made -- note the tense -- a call about what's in FTs long-term best interest. To suggest that he did not have precedent-setting in mind back in 2004 amounts to Monday morning quarterbacking (at best). @:-)
Originally Posted by
Bobster
I recommend voting against the motion.
Randy gives us extra latitude in OMNI, and we should cheerfully give him extra latitude in moderation in return for what he gives us.
Excellent point,
Bobster, with emphasis on "cheerfully." ^