Originally Posted by
Shareholder
Question to all the complainers out there... If it costs US -- or any other carrier -- 1¢ per mile the 500 minimum represents $5 out of its pocket. If most of this mileage is earned flying on fares that are in the $50-$100 range, does it make economic sense for US to be taking a 5%-10% hit on revenue just for FF miles? This is another cost that needs to be gotten control of, and this move is a very sensible one. COS bonus will raise the earnings for those paying F fares, and perhaps US will ultimately move in the direction of many other carriers who have a variable mileage return based on fare, where higher fares get full mileage, lower ones a discounted level.
Time to wake up and smell the coffee...
US carriers could do lots of things to increase revenue; that doesn't mean that doing those things would be the right thing to do. They could squeeze more rows in to the plane, they could stop cleaning the planes, they could stop cleaning the gate areas, they could stop supplying hot water in the bathroom, etc. etc. etc. But that would be penny wise and pound foolish.
Same story here. Sure, they might save some revenue. But that doesn't automatically make it a smart, or the right, decision.