I think the column is exceptionally well-reasoned and thoughtful but as to the question of why people endure these idiotic policies? I don't think the answer is a great mystery or a conspiracy: it's because most people don't travel enough to the point where the inconvenience and stupidity of the security measures outweighs the general inertia. For the occasional traveler, yes, the security is a hassle but if you only travel a couple times a year, you endure it. It's like going to the post office or the bank; you know you're going to wait a ridiculous amount of time so you try to minimize trips and, when you do have to go, get out as soon as you can. But for most people, it's not bothersome enough that it's going to drive you to stage protest rallies outside your post office, write a letter to the bank management or move your business to another bank.