FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - DIA and CO - Class Project
View Single Post
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 9:52 pm
  #22  
texd
20 Countries Visited500k30 Nights15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Programs: UA S; Marriott LG; IHG P; Hertz PC; AA, WN, Pan Am!
Posts: 820
Originally Posted by SJC ORD LDR
A west coast hub would be good and could be used to build up Asia more (or the could merge with UAL and get Asia that way).

SFO is very delay prone (fog). IIRC, LAX is supposed to get smaller not larger. I would think SJC could work if you can get in during a tech boom. They want to get an international destination other than Mexico again (not since AA canceled the SJC-NRT flight have they had this) and they are in the process of building a new terminal building (due to open sometime in 2010). So, the city leaders might give an airline incentive to fly out to some place in Asia or Europe. Problems with SJC are the ability to get the gates in a pattern that isn't a straight line (SJC is on a pretty tight property with very little room for expansion), a curfew (11:30 - 6:30 every night and you have rich people on both sides of the airport who won't budge on this), and running both runways could be tricky (though they are both 11,000'). It's difficult to picture a good west coast city.

Otherwise, I think DEN won't work for the reasons stated above (it's not that big of a city anyway).
LAS? Lord knows there's plenty of land around there... if gates are a problem you could probably build a(nother) new terminal (perhaps one without slots). And it has no curfew and is not likely to get one, much to the dismay of many residents. Sure as a destination/origin it's a cluster%*@(, but maybe it works as a "west coast" hub.
texd is offline