Originally Posted by
USirritated
Actually, all it proves is that you had already made up your mind before you ever read the article! The article clearly referred to "LONG TERM CONTRACTS" that were signed years before the national no smoking ban was put into place by Marriott. True, it referred to toxic and non-toxic levels of smoke and chemicals, but it did not actually find those levels anywhere outside of the ballroom where the event was being held. So, what is your point joshua362?
Marriott did not make exceptions for any Long Term Contracts when the policy was announced