FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - HP Ad - Ad is 'loading'
View Single Post
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 3:19 am
  #4  
lin821
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Home
Programs: AA, Delta, UA & thanks to FTers for my PC Gold!
Posts: 7,674
Only HP ad behaves like this so far...

Originally Posted by JGR01
Over the past couple of day...an ad for HP... is not the same as the other banner ads. I wonder if something can be done.

It takes perhaps 5 seconds for the thing to get to the point where I can stop it .. and then the regular FT screen (with banner and side ad) load.

This 'interruption' is getting frustrating and time consuming.
I've been running into the same HP ad 5 or 6 times by now. I didn't know this new wave of ad campaign is arriving at FT

This sort of "forced-fed" ad is not uncommon though. When I watch the TV program online (such as ABC, CBS, Fox...etc), I get to watch all the ad/commercials. I get the idea it's because of the sponsors that I can watch the episodes for FREE. All the commercials are about 30 seconds. Even though you can't skip it, different companies have different ways to "feed" it. For Fox, the commercials are built in seamlessly, meaning when the 30 seconds are over, the program resume by itself. Sort of like you are watching TV the traditional way. You just have to wait till the ad is over. That's fine with me.

For ABC, the online player will not resume to the program after the commercials are over. The viewers have to click on the "Continue", which is prompted at the end of each commercial, otherwise the next segment won't play. The recent HP ad at FT is similar to this, which is more intrusive than the others, IMHO. We are forced to "interact" with this HP ad. When I say "interact", I mean "wait till I can click the skip button" so I can go back to my normal FT viewing pleasure. Maybe I shouldn't complain too much since "skip" is still an option.

I know there's always trade-off for free FT. I can live with ads. I am just not sure if this form of ad is HP-specific. Or HP ad is simply a test-run before FT "adopts" (should I say IB) the new form universally? I surely hope it's not the latter.

I agree with JGR01 this "interruption" is costing us time.
lin821 is offline