FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Worst-case terrorist scenario
View Single Post
Old Oct 20, 2007 | 3:22 pm
  #82  
Global_Hi_Flyer
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,386
Originally Posted by Bart
I don't believe terrorists will settle for a theoretical possibility. They not only want to make absolutely sure that their acts of destruction are successfully carried out, but they also want the terror that comes from the use of explosives. They want the visibility that comes from a punch to the nose as opposed to the anonymity that comes from poisoning a drink. Being able to take credit is just as important as the deed itself. Otherwise, a government investigation could easily conclude that an airplane was downed due to a mechanical/electrical failure (and, if you really want to get carried away with this and jump into the conspiratorial aspects: the government could use this to mask terrorism by blaming it on mechanical/electrical failure). Either way, terrorists want us to know that they did this. A bomb does that. A gun pointed in someone's face does that. A plane flown deliberately into a building does that. A mysterious crash does not.
Bart's spot on. Part of the goal of the terrorist is to have a very high visibility event so as to instill fear in the American public as it goes about its normal life. Best way to do that is a large, loud, visible event. An EMI-based event won't cut it, IMHO.
Global_Hi_Flyer is offline