i guess were back onto a lighter note?
Originally Posted by
GDIW
The BBC is the same controlled news network
no response necessary.
Originally Posted by
GDIW
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Starred Review. An emeritus professor of theology with no previous interest in conspiracy theories,
Griffin's sources? > Christopher Bollyn for example, a
neo-nazi.
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com...stupid_15.html
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com...t-sources.html
some of his other ground-breaking articles of "truth" @
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/ >
CONTROLLED PRESS CONCEALS CHERTOFF'S ISRAELI ROOTS
Are Zionists Behind Banning of Truthful 9/11 Scientist?
Germany: 58 Years of US Occupation
Who is Behind the Abuse at Abu Ghraib? [Israel]
SO compelling
http://www.911review.com/denial/holocaust.html#bollyn
to their credit ^ a 9/11 "truth" site uncomfortable with Bollyn and other
neo-nazis being associated with the "truth" movement, as they word it >
Holocaust Denial Versus 9/11 Truth
if you happen to change your mind on the BBC (which has nothing to do with the Cambridge PhD engineer's study, but anyway..) or trusting
neo-nazi, non-scientist, "reporters" like Bollyn, id be happy to present more facts for potential discussion.
The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11
huh, im not familiar with that book. your earlier statements i read in effect say you believe there is proof that a controlled demolition took place at the WTC. if so, that is clearly MIHOP, not LIHOP - LIHOP being the one which the vast majority of those who "question the official story" lean towards. and clearly Pearl Harbor was NOT a case of MIHOP, but is said by conspiracy theorists to have been a case of LIHOP. that being said.. does Griffin actually make the case that Pearl Harbor was a case of MIHOP in that book
and another little tidbit
Originally Posted by
GDIW
It has already been discredited many times.
if "discredited" means having their staff called "jews" and "government controlled" or "CIA agents" (or all of the above?) i guess youre right, thats clearly proof that its 100% propaganda.