Originally Posted by
AAaLot
Said they would 'catch' it later...however, I think there might be a chance.
Interestingly, she mentioned (but did not quote) that LGA/JFK were NOT land segments which makes even less sense to me.
Catch how/what? There's nothing inherently *wrong* with the use of LON, so what's there to "catch"?. And that bit about London being a surface segment but New York not sounds so weird it is impossible to believe.
Maybe a junior agent making things up?