Originally Posted by justhere

Definitely a lot of questions that still need to be answered; however, I found it interesting that at the end of her story she said something about being made to go back through security even though she had been with the officer the whole time. It's clear in the video that someone (her fiance?) comes to hold the child. She has now come in contact with someone that hasn't been screened so it would make sense that she be rescreened.

The fact that she felt it necessary to point out that she had to be rescreened seems to indicate that she was trying to add one more thing to show how ridiculous the situation was. But it wasn't ridiculous to rescreen her so now I am more skeptical about the rest of her story.

Don't get me wrong, the whole thing shouldn't have happened but it did and now we have to decide who did what and to whom.