FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Why not move p.s. to EWR and drop JFK completely?
Thread: Why not move p.s. to EWR and drop JFK completely?
View Single Post
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 12:23 pm
  #34  
stevenshev
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New York, London, Sydney
Programs: United GS/2MM, DL*P, VS*G, AA*EXP, Avis CHM, Hertz Platinum, Sixt*D, HH*D, HGP*P, Starwood*P
Posts: 9,877
Originally Posted by BenjaminNYC
2 x day to LAX. No others. If you get on one of those, it's the best deal in domestic aviation. For this reason, CO SELLS OUT F well in advance on ALL transcons. On average, only one person is upgraded per flight (confirmed by CO Insider). In flight soft product is superior to ps C and almost as good as ps F. Seriously, it's the best transcon product out there. Period.
CO F is also dirt cheap, relatively speaking. I still prefer p.s., because paid Y = p.s. C and paid C = p.s. F, both of which are better deals than paying for CO F, but I see where BJ, and others, are coming from.
stevenshev is offline