Originally Posted by
opus17
The burden of proof is on the other side...unless you can prove it doesn't, the rule makes sense. This is basic risk management, since the risk is on the interference, not the lack of interference. You do mitigation by having the rule about transmitting devices.
The burden of proof is on the poster who said a 747 with everyone turning on their cell phones "can and will" cause interference. It's not about the rule, I'm asking
IFE Wizard about his "study."