FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - EWR or LHR?
Thread: EWR or LHR?
View Single Post
Old May 24, 2007 | 2:56 pm
  #7  
GenevaFlyer
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: AMS
Programs: A number, but no status no more
Posts: 3,050
Originally Posted by aktchi
1. No tight connections. I'd rather have 3-4 hours to connect at JFK or LHR than 55 minutes at a cute small airport.

2. When possible, no change of airline. This is better for smoother baggage transfer.

I'd suggest putting aside your dislike of EWR and looking at all options objectively. Good luck.
Hi there,

I would agree. I took a quick look on ITA, and there are a number of flights from STL to EWR and EWR to STL. Just plan for a 2.5 - 3 hour layover, and there will be no problem.

However, given possible weather issues, I would recommend AMS over EWR. The New York area can get some bad rainstorms in June, and that really causes air traffic havock.

Overall, I'm based in Geneva, and lately, I've been using AMS and EWR as my preferred connection points (anything over CDG for the time being).

Cheers,

GenevaFlyer
GenevaFlyer is offline