FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - OW vs Star
Thread: OW vs Star
View Single Post
Old Mar 3, 2004 | 7:06 pm
  #5  
QF ExLurker
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SYD
Programs: QF PS and spouse of QP Senior Lifer PS, UA, AA, DL, AS, AV, TK
Posts: 766
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by NM:
Ahh, the old Logic verses Politics debate again. logic says ZRH is a good point for QF. But one of he largest (if not the largest) QF shareholders may have something to say about sending Euro-destined pax to ZRH rather than to the BA stronghold of LHR.</font>
Do not have a QF annual report with me right now, but AFAIK BA has 25% holding, so must be the largest single shareholder by a long way. Therefore we are doomed to overfly Continental Europe for the time being. If BA instead of AF had bought KLM, AMS may have become an option for the LHR overflow.
QF ExLurker is offline