FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Why isn't Gold top status?
View Single Post
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 5:04 am
  #6  
willyroo
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: BNE, Australia...not too far from the nearest Qantas Pub err Club
Posts: 3,636
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by BAe 146:
Not the most important issue in the world I know but I've always thought with the QFF 'metals' for status that the platinum card is a bit dull.

On a recent flight I saw my gold luggage tags next to some plat ones in the overhead bin and just thought the gold looked better.

I guess Qantas' problem with going Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum was that they couldn't do a proper shiny platinum like on credit cards because it was taken by silver.

Perhaps they could have called the non-status tier 'red' and then gone bronze silver and gold, more like BA, or are platinum's happy with the 'understated elegance of their card'?

</font>
QF's top tier used to be Gold - ie Blue, Silver, then Gold.

To get Gold, you had to travel on 80(?) revenue flights in a 12 month period. That then became 1700 status credits, an incredible total back then (1999: 8 SCs - BNE-SYD). When Platinum was introduced, the threshold was reduced to 1,400 SCs.

Platinum did co-incide with a major revamp of the QFF scheme, so maybe it was felt that new colours heralded the significance of the changes.
willyroo is offline