I think we're getting to the crux of it -- enforcement of rules/standards.

I've raised the same issue with regard to properties which are MI (aka "corporate")-managed and those that are not corporate-managed (franchisee or franchisee's designate) and been told that they're the same (or supposed to be the same).

(Of course, as to MR, specific exceptions are spelled out in various Mr T's and C's and within the rules/terms of specific offerings; example -- EEOs).

The question that I wish I could pose to MI is "Will you or will you not respond (and take appropriate action) as to indesputable, documented cases of non-compliance by flagged properties of the rules which are part and parcel of the representation of MR of its rules and benefits?"