Originally Posted by
Bart
To tell you the truth, I really am surprised at all the hooplah over the TSO job. In my previous profession, I did things that would chill a lot of the folks in here...all in the name of God and country...none of it illegal, but a helluva lot of it certainly controversial. And I was pretty good at it, too.
Morals? Just a matter of perspective in my previous line of work. Not that it was the old argument of the ends justifying the means; however, in order to be effective as an intelligence officer, one has to divorce oneself from the conventional perceptions of right and wrong. Again, I'm not saying that an intelligence operator engages in illegal activities; but I am saying that a lot of the work probably goes against the grain of what many people consider appropriate, moral, whatever. It amazed me that even within the intel community, there were people who clung to the belief that "gentlemen don't read other gentlemen's mail." Of course, I was in the dirtiest business of all: human intelligence. There are no saints in HUMINT. I most certainly am no saint.
That's why I see my job at TSA as such a cake walk and without controversy. This is why many of the comments I read in here about the morality of TSA make me giggle.
This current job just doesn't compare by any stretch of the imagination.
I would think that many of the folks who frequent this forum would be more sophisticated than that.
As for your America comment: I'd die for this country. (Note Patton's quote still holds: "No dumb bast*rd ever won a war by dying for his country...." but you get the idea of what I mean.) Been in many situations when I put it all on the line and in many instances with the knowledge that if anything went wrong, my wife would be told that I was involved in a training mishap or some other BS story.
I could be wrong about this, but I don't think that your resume is as interesting to everyone else as it is to you.
What was the topic again? I think it was whether raising awareness is silly and whether it is appropriate to confront screeners with complaints. Those do seem to be very innocuous actions. You may not like them, and you may wish to label them as immature, but I'll just observe that this is typical. People typically find all manner of excuse to label as "immature" things that they disagree with, particularly if they have a vested interested in the opposite position. It's human nature, and utterly predictable.
It's rare to find a person who can fairly assess views that they disagree with.