Originally Posted by
brahms77
I have experienced both SQ F sky suites and NH new F suite as well as UA F suite. SQ F, depite being old (probably as old as UA F, please correct me if I am wrong), it felt much more comfortable than NH new F suite. The foot rest on NH F is somewhat bothersome when sleeping sideways (it gets around your knees).
Expect very high level of attentive service from the SQ girls and boys.
You will be so spoiled after that flight that you will never want to return to Y or even C!
How is the SQ "suite", with much less privacy and about 8 inches less width, more comfortable than the new F seat on ANA?
I did both in Feb this year and found ANA to be MUCH better than SQ, and not just with the seat. You practically disappear into that ANA F suite.
The FAs on ANA were better than those on SQ when it came to service and watching out for passengers' needs. SQ was also a bit "sloppy" with presentation when it came to the meal. I have never quite understood the hype with SQ (yes, I've been in their F at least 10 times). JAL, CX, NH are all at LEAST on equal grounds or better.
ANA has a much larger food selection in F as well, with multiple snacks and a true "a la carte" system in between the usual meal times. With SQ you get to pick from a few cheap "snacks" (read: instant noodles or sandwiches, crisps, chocolate bars, fruit), while on ANA (and JAL) you can pick from about 10 a la carte dishes that are actually GOOD quality. SQ also will not let you pick and choose items from the general menu as a snack (so you cannot order caviar half-way through the flight), whereas with ANA this is an option.