Originally Posted by
GUWonder
Are some people reading the word "all" where the word "all" is not used?
This to me is the loophole that I think makes this seem unenforceable and kind of irrelevant. You can leave the word ALL off any statement and it fits the rules as Dov described them, or if questioned/reprimanded you can stand on that.
You asked if my question was about silencing views I dont agree with, no. My question truthfully was to understand that part of TOS as I didnt understand it. My issues with it was less about the TS/S forum, I can avoid that (and mostly do), it isnt even w1ith posts.
My frustration is related to signatures, those are the ones that jump out and slap me with the issue. When I read "Person X is Stupidier than my Banana Slug" over and over it really bothers me. I dont particularly like most of the people being bashed either, but I dont care what loophole you come up with
THOSE ARE PERSONAL ATTACKS on someone. And I was trying to understand why FT lets the reputation of the site be drawn down with that garbage.