Are some people reading the word "all" where the word "all" is not used?

People criticize overseas call centers (and their reps) as a group quite often on FT. Is that a TOS violation by the same "standard"?

People criticize muslims as a group on FT quite often, is that a TOS violation by the same "standard"?

People criticize racist profilers as a group on FT, is that a TOS violation by the same "standard"?

Note that the word "all" does not precede "people" in any of those situations. Are any or all of those violations by the TOS "standard" that some would have applied to protect the TSA as a group?

Is this about some people not liking a message (that doesn't gel with their own) and thus trying to kill the messenger in the pursuit of silencing that "disliked"/"not accepted"/"not favored" message, a message which is not necessarily a TOS violation by standards applied to-date? I'm sure that such silencing would make some people happy, but hopefully that's not the way FT management and deputed personnel operate, for it's not the way FT has systematically operated before either.