FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Price Difference: any recourse?
View Single Post
Old Mar 9, 2007 | 5:57 am
  #14  
elgringito
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Newport, NJ, USA
Posts: 2,114
Originally Posted by otralot
Airline tickets are different than all examples above. In these examples you have actually used the product or completed the transaction. WIth airline tickets pricing is all over the place. A person buying an X ticket 3 months in advance is assumed to get a better deal then buying a ticket 4 weeksi n advance. That is the hedge (or supposedely). The fact is that airlines really don't work that way anymore and pricing rarely has anything to do with how much it actually costs to get that butt in the seat from point A to B. That's why I could buy a $240 RT BWI/LAX today for a trip 6 days out. I am sure I have paid less the people who bought 3 months out.

If you reward the airlines with your advanced purchase ( yes reward, you have given them cash to operate for a service that actually takes place in the future. How many businesses have that operating model) that is non-refundable if you can't take a flight. The least they can do is give you a refund if the fare goes down because they mispriced demand and fare levels.

I would consider going for the $2.50 refund on prinicple becuase it probably actually costs them more to refund the money. Maybe if enough people do this they'll get the idea.
How do you get "yes reward, you have given them cash to operate for a service that actually takes place in the future. How many businesses have that operating model". While I agree they have the cash in advance, they also have the commitment to provide the passenger with a seat at the price agreed upon, even if they end up oversold and must pay compensation for a volunteer that might exceed the price paid.

You seem to miss the concept - the airline pricing models evaluate load factors and determine how many seats to sell at what price and time. The consumer decides how much he is willing to pay, how important the timing is and decides to make a purchase at what THEY decide is the maximum benefit. BOTH parties make imperfect decisions - why should only the seller have to stick with the contract?
elgringito is offline