Originally Posted by
Seat13c
In light of that B6 has 2 options if they want to get the planes in a physical condition they should be A)contract out to a carrier (obviously without personal IFE's) or B) don't fly at all. Therefore, my question is which option is better?
Your changing the goalposts. No one is arguing that they should stop flying. You're arguing that AC should have been mentioned in the news report. I argue it should not because B6 swapping out planes is a much bigger deal than AC doing so. Why? Because of the way B6 markets itself. If AC had massage chairs on its flights and all their commercials said so, then it would be significant if they had to swap our planes as well.