Originally Posted by
davidcalgary29
I agree, but I simply don't think that this is viable in today's political climate. No politician in either the US or Canada would survive any suggestion that security could and should be delegated to a private agency. And, indeed, there is a strong argument to be made in Canadian constitutional law that it would be unlawful to remove airport security from the purvue of the federal government.
There are many immoral and destructive things that are done because the correct answer is not politically viable.
I'm not really interested in what is politically viable.
Originally Posted by
davidcalgary29
And, indeed, there is a strong argument to be made in Canadian constitutional law that it would be unlawful to remove airport security from the purvue of the federal government.
Sounds like you live under men enforcing a flawed constitution as well then. That makes two of us.