FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - A few questions re newborn babies on NW
View Single Post
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 12:10 pm
  #11  
JS
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: GSP (Greenville, SC)
Programs: DL Gold Medallion; UA Premier Executive; WN sub-CP; AA sub-Gold
Posts: 13,393
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by NWAMileageSlave:

One final thoguht. I remember reading about an aircraft hull failing due to metal fatigue. I believe it was a very old 37 over Hawaii. It basically ripped itself a sun roof. The only fatality was an FA who was serving drinks. Everybody else was belted in. Considering the age of some (ok all) of NW's DC-9s, If that happened on a flight with my daughter in my lap, I don't know if I could hold on to her. Call it irrational, but it justifies the expense of a seat.

[/B]</font>
Yes, it is irrational. After that crash, the FAA recommended that airlines check for microscopic cracks in the aircraft skin.

From a cost-benefit point of view, wearing a bulletproof vest 24 hours a day would be a better idea than buying a newborn a First Class seat.
JS is offline