Originally Posted by
hiltonhead
So lets get this straight for the record.
1) You bothering to point out that you feel that there are a number of reasons for FAMs to not be in the airport and that anyone could have saved the person' life should not be considered as more of your TSA bashing. If this was a compliment or "atta-boy", then your wording was way off.
2) If anyone from the FAMS does anything positive, then it should not be posted here because it is merely "PR for the FAM program", yet ALL negative input is welcomed.
3) The fact that the man was saved by a FAM should not have been included in the article because it is ancillary. Using this logic, I propose that all future negative posts dealing with anyone from TSA, FAMS, etc. should exclude who they work for. As Dovster pointed out there seems to be no problem with mentioning their employer when the press is negative.
4) You could have shown a lot more class by simply posting "good job" and leaving it at that.
Talk about the above quote barking up the wrong tree in so many ways. That certainly doesn't set anything straight for the record.
Notice: this article was placed here as PR spin for the FAM program.
Additionally: FAM management didn't want to give credit where credit is due.