FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - What is the fairest way to give priority when rebooking flights?
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 1:56 am
  #14  
tcswede
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tübingen, Germany
Posts: 2,732
Originally Posted by flyrights
Rather than just throwing out blank statements, can you please give a reason WHY you think I have no concept of "business operations". It's very easy to write what you wrote. Try to put a little thought into it, by backing it up with something... SOMETHING... ANYTHING. Otherwise, it's just dull... and that's far worse than having no concept of business operations.
I am sure a draw out of the hat would seriously pi$$ off the frequent revenue bringer = high status pax of any one airline.

Business sense is to look at who brings what revenue - data that the airline will have on hand in such a situation - when trying to deal with less available seats than required in a situation such as you describe.

Common sense - IMHO - would be to satisfy those that bring me most revenue - either at that moment - i.e priority to full fare or to prioritize by status - which works quite well on the European FFP - as they are far more revenue driven than the US ones. The status orientation would ensure future loyalty - because it will steer new and or keep existing business - whereas a one of pax shows little loyalty beyond price concerns.

Any business tries to build on its repeat customers as a basis - new business is good to get but IMHO again retaining is business is more important.

Why do I focus on one airline - because I know that when someting goes wrong they - in my case LH as a LH HON - will take great care in working out the best solution - which in cases have even gotten me there earlier than the cancelled option that I had booked. FFP are not only about miles and lounges - the real importance with frequent flying lies in what happens when something goes wrong.

Cheers

Thomas
tcswede is offline