Originally Posted by
PhilUSA
... not only planes are 'run-down'. When I recently flew US omn PHL-FRA crew was also way beyond 'sell-by' date ...
I don't want to sound that way and I certainly like the idea of having more senior people in a team as they can be very valuable teachers - however if the entire crew of an A330 is over 55 - there is something wrong with this. Why can't they mix some youngsters in - this will add a better flavor to the entire product. But it is not my job to improve US. I am glad that LH takes a different appraoch.
Cabin crew age is a reflection of the demography of US employees. Have you aver looked inside a US cockpit? Many FOs have completely white hair and it looks like they will soon retire. The point is that US hasn't been growing as a company in years, and most employees are survivors of the post 9/11 furloughs. That is one of the biggest financial problems with north American carriers: even when they've fired all the less senior people, and cut salaries, the workforce is on average very senior and paid at the highest levels of the seniority scale. In general, keeping labor costs down requires growth, or at least a balanced workforce in terms of seniority, so that the average salary in not too high on the scale.
If you look at a LH longhaul flight, you always see a veteran captain and a young FO (in his thirties). That's a perfect balance. On many carriers in the US, everybody is old. One day these airlines might even have problems replacing personell as the old generation retires at once.