[QUOTE]Originally posted by Plato90s:
Are you a law clerk for the firm defending this guy? Or maybe the agent's cousin?


Nope worse yet, An American who believes in the rights that made this country the home of the free and whom despises racism and bigotry as well as big business running roughshod with their big money lobbying, lawyers and lies.


Is it impossible to disagree with you without having ulterior motives like being an employee of AA?

Not when you adopt such calous disregard for the truth. I assumed you must be on the payroll. It would not be the first time AA and others have planted persons to push their agenda amongst stock and frequent flyer boards.


None of your three discrepancies were part of AA's statements, since AA only made one (1) statement so far. You're finding discrepancies within reporters' stories, which are based on their guesses and innuendo. Big surprise that those reporters made mistakes.

Now I know you are full of it... AA made three different public statements as summized above.. A quick check of the news, will verify what the AA spokesmen said.. Of course I can see your next argument will be that the people hired to speak on AA's behalf and that do so publically must have not been doing so on AA's behalf.. You are a work of art. Do you always ignore truth and fact for your deluded view?


Personally, I'd love to see this thing go to court. Regulation and law is clearly on AA's side, which is why they will vigorously defend this charge.


Regulation is not CLEARLY on anyones side. AA violated it's operational certificate and violated several civil rights laws, as well as FAR's, unfortunately for everyone the law is self contradictory and it will be an interesting trial. The interesting point is that for the most part the "law" on FARs is an FAA regulation in contrast to the civil rights acts.. As explained by a lawyer to me during this subject conversation today there is significance in that in that one is voted in by representatives and another is a "rule" made by a federal agency and hence in court one sees rules carry less weight then laws...