<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Yaatri:
Yes remarkable in the sense he had no consioderation that he was taking over some body else's seat and the presumption a child always mean inconvenience. It is the presumption that somebody is benefiting at your expense, or that you are going to suffer that makes people incosiderate. Moreover he spilled a drink not my son!!!!.
</font>
Under similar circumstances, I'd try moving, too.
But if the seat owner showed up at the last moment, I'd go back if the person didn't want to trade.
No, children don't always mean inconvenience, of course. But IMHO the risk is terribly high, with no corresponding benefit...