Originally Posted by
Pickles
...As for comparing JL to AA, that's not meaningful. AA is an unmitigated piece of crap compared to JL, and of course, to CX. ....
It really depends on the route. JL J service is very market driven, and varies by routes (luckily most US routes now have the better JL service). JL has in-air J service on some routes that is
worse than AA J. Plus JL ground service is very polite and very ineffective. There is a complete lack of empowerment for first-line JL employees. So you get absurdly bad service, but lots of "very sorry" and "nothing we can do" -- when 99% of the airlines in the world can and will do better. Overall I consider JL to be a below average airline because of this (re-routing, irregular ops and last-minute changes are very important for me). JL J is poor, and I stand by that asessment; JL F is much better. However both are not competitive with CX. Even Japanese businessmen are now flying CX on NRT-HKG -- an unheard of act of betrayal, to not fly JL.
Sure, the onboard JL service is obsequious at all times, but I don't count that as good service, and simply cannot agree that "AA is an unmitigated piece of crap compared to JL". In fact overall I rate AA as a superior airline to JL.