Don't get haughty. Since you weren't there, don't get off on some "evidence and facts were ignored crap."

And "actually" you didn't. That's why I replied. But you appear to want the last word on it and try to whitewash your statements above.

I can't be responsible for your 'logical' understanding of the law. Don't give me this "I tried to explain logically, and they were just morons but I'm still getting the last word so I win" crap.

You have a different opinion (fine), but it's not based on anything other than your brain and typing it out. So go find and actual legal definition, and post it. I did. That's my next challenge. Your next post be based on actual legal definition.

The evidence and facts weren't ignored. They were quoted, and followed up or linked upon (at least by me).

I didn't discuss suing anyone or anything extreme. But you seem to be backpeddling, so I'll let it lie.