Honestly, I don't believe that the A320 had any more legroom than the usual QF domestic plane. In fact, I felt even more cramped into the seat on the NZ flight and would never fly them again if I couldn't get an exit row in advance. There is no way they have 32'' legroom on the A320. My legs don't lie (they are actually the same length no matter on which plane I sit, I believe ) and I was hardly able to squeeze into the seat (I would say it was the same as the QF plane). So, one of the two airlines is lying about their legroom, and I don't think that QF would say they've got only 30'' if in fact they had 32''...leaves only one possibility...NZ actually has less legroom than they claim...