Federalized screeners won't solve the problem you're intimating, apparently that of an outside threat. As a matter of fact, neither would private screeners. But whoever said INTERNAL security at an airport was going to solve that problem?

There are a lot of types of debate techniques being exercised on this board in different discussions, and this is a perfect example of one of them. This is an example of misdirection. Rather than resort to this, just debate the points being made rationally, as we'll all benefit from rational discussion even if we find out that we personally are wrong.

One thing they're doing that I DO feel good about - requiring these security personnel to be American citizens. Before the politically correct comments descend upon me, my grandfather immigrated from Italy and was proud to become a citizen - I personally believe taking that step shows a deeper commitment. Is it 100%? Of course not - but it's a good step and one overdue. I don't believe the FBI or CIA or other federal security agencies hire (well, for advertised positions!) anyone other than American citizens, and since most other countries I can think of do the same, then why shouldn't we? We're founded on immigrants, it's true, but those immigrants wanted to become citizens, and if others want to be here and not be citizens, I **** well support their right but they should not have all the same opportunities and status that Americans do, including the right to vote (which they don't).