The last point doesn't matter as it is moot. This thread has just turned into a pistol match and non-dissuasive or discussive of pertiant ideas. I hear you, however, I do not. I think the parents were disruptive and not disorderly, it would be the task of the property to remove a disorderly individual. The parents just had bad manners. Would it be in the best interest of the property to limit those over the age of 21 to the lounge? I would say the parent(s) paid for the lounge so they would say not. Your client paid for the lounge as well as you did and you think so. So you can see where this is going, nowhere.