Originally Posted by GreaterFool
So if you can think of any difference, your logic is excused? That is a fallacy. Your core argument is that you enjoy the right to abuse public servants, but if they respond, they should be punished.
Karen H. enjoyed an arrest based on her inability to control her temper with an LEO, and had her "case" picked up here by the freedom fighters.
Of course, none of them actually did anything, but they sure used a lot of invective.
Logic. Don't bring a knife to a gun fight. The difference between slaves and screeners voluntarily working for a dysfunctional joke of an agency is not fallacy.