FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Internet Explorer 7 is worth the trouble and the wait
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 12:29 pm
  #24  
doc
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 46,817
Originally Posted by kanebear
Based upon? Is your Doctorate in Information Technology? Are you a security expert? If not, how can you make such assertions with such certainty?? The Phishing filter is a good idea... as usual, Microsoft's execution is less than stellar. I agree with comments that it's going to give people a false sense of security... much like the TSA, no?

As for FireFox, it doesn't need an integrated RSS reader and I wouldn't want for it to have one. The beauty of FF and what I wish MS would get 'round their heads is that you customize the browser to do and be what you want. Most people don't need, won't ever use, and couldn't care less about RSS. Yet MS includes that and tons of other features people don't want and need. This creates bloat and potential security flaws.

Firefox? You add what you want. I don't know about you but I'm all for choice and will do a-la-carte any time I can. Especially when it means that someone can knock together a better mousetrap and I'm not stuck with whatever was integrated into the browser. New RSS features come out? Someone'll do a new reader and I just plug it in. It's not perfect and isn't as well integrated into the browser as IE7.

For folks that DO want killer RSS built in along with the kitchen sink? There's Flock.... with an RSS implementation that blows IE's away. You don't have to use all the sharing stuff either.



Oh I think so. IE6 and IE7 render pages differently and some sites that work properly on IE6 will not run on IE7 and need coding changes. Here is a discussion that's pretty enlightening. Our intranet is one of 'em.

There's also stability considerations. Any time you introduce a change into a stable system you run the risk of conflicts that can destabilize and ruin the reliability of a system. How many times have we seen MS patches that broke previously working features/programs/systems??? So yes, I'd think MANY would dispute this.



Yes, unless you have a system running software that is broken by SP2, which is the unfortunate case for some. But, damn the facts, recommend away, please!

----

Thank you for being kind enough to express your opinion.

Please be aware that facts are just that, and that they are not the same as opinions - even if those opinions are yours.

Does one actually need a PhD in Information Technology to have an opinion these days - or to post their opinion on FT?

Surely anyone can feel free to run SP1, even though SP2 has been out for about 2 years now, and MS no longer even supports it!

And anyone can feel free to run IE6, as they now do, even though it is not a very good browser. Its up to them, of course, not to you, or to me!

Mark
doc is offline