Originally Posted by cme2c
It's not that he disagreed with the opinion, it's that it seemed like an irrational thing to do and made him suspicious, what is wrong with that? The OP would not have done it if he didn't think it would arouse suspicion, he has admitted as such.
Are you sure about that? I think the anger he was addressed pretty much thru rationality out on the TSA's part. And I think it's quite obvious that supervisor disagreed with the opinion.
Sure, Rosa Parks sitting in the front of the bus and refusing to move appeared to be suspiscious and caused a red flag. It also sparked much needed change. And back then, people would have said that her moving to the back of the bus wasn't a big deal and she was just a troublemaker.
Oh how we repeat history if we refuse to learn from it.